How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Namibia?

22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Wildfire area burned by land cover type, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Hong Kong vs Namibia: Wildfire area burned by land cover type, per square kilometre

Hong Kong

0 hectares per square kilometre

in 2023

Namibia

0.0001 hectares per square kilometre

in 2023

Hong Kong rank

97th

Namibia rank

95th

Wildfire area burned by land cover type, per square kilometre over time

Hong Kong
Namibia

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 0.0001 hectares per square kilometre against 0 hectares per square kilometre in Hong Kong, a difference of 0.0001 hectares per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Namibia ahead.

Hong Kong ranks 97th and Namibia ranks 95th of 206 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Hong Kong averaged higher in 2 and Namibia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Hong Kong	Namibia	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0.0383 hectares per square kilometre	0.0002 hectares per square kilometre	0.0382 hectares per square kilometre	Hong Kong
2010s	0.002 hectares per square kilometre	0.0001 hectares per square kilometre	0.0019 hectares per square kilometre	Hong Kong
2020s	0 hectares per square kilometre	0 hectares per square kilometre	0 hectares per square kilometre	Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher wildfire area burned by land cover type, per square kilometre, Hong Kong or Namibia?: Namibia, at 0.0001 hectares per square kilometre against 0 hectares per square kilometre in Hong Kong as of 2023.
What is the difference in wildfire area burned by land cover type, per square kilometre between Hong Kong and Namibia?: 0.0001 hectares per square kilometre, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Namibia?: 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
How do Hong Kong and Namibia rank globally for wildfire area burned by land cover type, per square kilometre?: Hong Kong ranks 97th and Namibia ranks 95th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Wildfire area burned by land cover type, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong vs Namibia: Wildfire area burned by land cover type, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/wildfire-area-burned-by-land-cover-type-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/wildfire-area-burned-by-land-cover-type-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/namibia/">Hong Kong vs Namibia: Wildfire area burned by land cover type, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Wildfire area burned by land cover type, per square kilometre
Unit: hectares per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 206 places, 4,504 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed: 22 September 2026

Wildfire area burned by land cover type divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.