New Zealand vs Norway: Wildfire area burned by land cover type, per capita
New Zealand
0 hectares per person
in 2025
Norway
0 hectares per person
in 2025
New Zealand rank
97th
Norway rank
97th
Wildfire area burned by land cover type, per capita over time
- New Zealand
- Norway
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 0 hectares per person against 0 hectares per person in Norway, a difference of 0 hectares per person.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Norway ahead.
New Zealand ranks 97th and Norway ranks 97th of 206 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wildfire area burned by land cover type, per capita, New Zealand or Norway?
- New Zealand, at 0 hectares per person against 0 hectares per person in Norway as of 2025.
- What is the difference in wildfire area burned by land cover type, per capita between New Zealand and Norway?
- 0 hectares per person, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Norway?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2025.
- How do New Zealand and Norway rank globally for wildfire area burned by land cover type, per capita?
- New Zealand ranks 97th and Norway ranks 97th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Wildfire area burned by land cover type, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Wildfire area burned by land cover type divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.