New Caledonia vs United Kingdom: Wildfire area burned by land cover type, per capita

New Caledonia
0 hectares per person
in 2025
United Kingdom
0 hectares per person
in 2025
New Caledonia rank
97th
United Kingdom rank
94th

Wildfire area burned by land cover type, per capita over time

  • New Caledonia
  • United Kingdom
0000.001200220132025

How they compare

United Kingdom currently reports 0 hectares per person against 0 hectares per person in New Caledonia, a difference of 0 hectares per person.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2002 it was New Caledonia ahead.

New Caledonia ranks 97th and United Kingdom ranks 94th of 206 countries.

New Caledonia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Caledonia United Kingdom Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0001 hectares per person 0 hectares per person 0.0001 hectares per person New Caledonia
2010s 0.0001 hectares per person 0 hectares per person 0.0001 hectares per person New Caledonia
2020s 0.0001 hectares per person 0 hectares per person 0.0001 hectares per person New Caledonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher wildfire area burned by land cover type, per capita, New Caledonia or United Kingdom?
United Kingdom, at 0 hectares per person against 0 hectares per person in New Caledonia as of 2025.
What is the difference in wildfire area burned by land cover type, per capita between New Caledonia and United Kingdom?
0 hectares per person, with United Kingdom ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and United Kingdom?
24 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2025.
How do New Caledonia and United Kingdom rank globally for wildfire area burned by land cover type, per capita?
New Caledonia ranks 97th and United Kingdom ranks 94th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Wildfire area burned by land cover type, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Caledonia vs United Kingdom: Wildfire area burned by land cover type, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/wildfire-area-burned-by-land-cover-type-per-capita/new-caledonia/united-kingdom/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/wildfire-area-burned-by-land-cover-type-per-capita/new-caledonia/united-kingdom/">New Caledonia vs United Kingdom: Wildfire area burned by land cover type, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Wildfire area burned by land cover type, per capita
Unit
hectares per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 4,944 data points, 2002–2025
Last refreshed

Wildfire area burned by land cover type divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.