What is the difference in wildfire area burned by land cover type, per capita between Israel and New Caledonia?

0 hectares per person, with Israel ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and New Caledonia?

24 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2025.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Wildfire area burned by land cover type, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Israel vs New Caledonia: Wildfire area burned by land cover type, per capita

Israel

0 hectares per person

in 2025

New Caledonia

0 hectares per person

in 2025

Israel rank

97th

New Caledonia rank

97th

Wildfire area burned by land cover type, per capita over time

Israel
New Caledonia

How they compare

Israel currently reports 0 hectares per person against 0 hectares per person in New Caledonia, a difference of 0 hectares per person.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2002 it was New Caledonia ahead.

Israel ranks 97th and New Caledonia ranks 97th of 206 countries.

New Caledonia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Israel	New Caledonia	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0 hectares per person	0.0001 hectares per person	0.0001 hectares per person	New Caledonia
2010s	0 hectares per person	0.0001 hectares per person	0.0001 hectares per person	New Caledonia
2020s	0 hectares per person	0.0001 hectares per person	0.0001 hectares per person	New Caledonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher wildfire area burned by land cover type, per capita, Israel or New Caledonia?: Israel, at 0 hectares per person against 0 hectares per person in New Caledonia as of 2025.
What is the difference in wildfire area burned by land cover type, per capita between Israel and New Caledonia?: 0 hectares per person, with Israel ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and New Caledonia?: 24 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2025.
How do Israel and New Caledonia rank globally for wildfire area burned by land cover type, per capita?: Israel ranks 97th and New Caledonia ranks 97th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Wildfire area burned by land cover type, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Israel vs New Caledonia: Wildfire area burned by land cover type, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/wildfire-area-burned-by-land-cover-type-per-capita/israel/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/wildfire-area-burned-by-land-cover-type-per-capita/israel/new-caledonia/">Israel vs New Caledonia: Wildfire area burned by land cover type, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Wildfire area burned by land cover type, per capita
Unit: hectares per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 206 places, 4,944 data points, 2002–2025
Last refreshed: 22 September 2026

Wildfire area burned by land cover type divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.