Grenada vs New Zealand: Wildfire area burned by land cover type, per capita

Grenada
0 hectares per person
in 2025
New Zealand
0 hectares per person
in 2025
Grenada rank
97th
New Zealand rank
97th

Wildfire area burned by land cover type, per capita over time

  • Grenada
  • New Zealand
00000200220132025

How they compare

Grenada currently reports 0 hectares per person against 0 hectares per person in New Zealand, a difference of 0 hectares per person.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2002 it was New Zealand ahead.

Grenada ranks 97th and New Zealand ranks 97th of 206 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Grenada averaged higher in 2 and New Zealand in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Grenada New Zealand Difference Ahead
2000s 0 hectares per person 0 hectares per person 0 hectares per person New Zealand
2010s 0.0001 hectares per person 0 hectares per person 0.0001 hectares per person Grenada
2020s 0.0001 hectares per person 0 hectares per person 0.0001 hectares per person Grenada

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher wildfire area burned by land cover type, per capita, Grenada or New Zealand?
Grenada, at 0 hectares per person against 0 hectares per person in New Zealand as of 2025.
What is the difference in wildfire area burned by land cover type, per capita between Grenada and New Zealand?
0 hectares per person, with Grenada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and New Zealand?
24 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2025.
How do Grenada and New Zealand rank globally for wildfire area burned by land cover type, per capita?
Grenada ranks 97th and New Zealand ranks 97th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Wildfire area burned by land cover type, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Grenada vs New Zealand: Wildfire area burned by land cover type, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/wildfire-area-burned-by-land-cover-type-per-capita/grenada/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/wildfire-area-burned-by-land-cover-type-per-capita/grenada/new-zealand/">Grenada vs New Zealand: Wildfire area burned by land cover type, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Wildfire area burned by land cover type, per capita
Unit
hectares per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 4,944 data points, 2002–2025
Last refreshed

Wildfire area burned by land cover type divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.