Fiji vs Nepal: Wildfire area burned by land cover type, per capita
Fiji
0 hectares per person
in 2025
Nepal
0 hectares per person
in 2025
Fiji rank
97th
Nepal rank
97th
Wildfire area burned by land cover type, per capita over time
- Fiji
- Nepal
How they compare
Fiji currently reports 0 hectares per person against 0 hectares per person in Nepal, a difference of 0 hectares per person.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Nepal ahead.
Fiji ranks 97th and Nepal ranks 97th of 206 countries.
Fiji has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Fiji | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | Fiji |
| 2010s | 0.0001 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | 0.0001 hectares per person | Fiji |
| 2020s | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | Fiji |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wildfire area burned by land cover type, per capita, Fiji or Nepal?
- Fiji, at 0 hectares per person against 0 hectares per person in Nepal as of 2025.
- What is the difference in wildfire area burned by land cover type, per capita between Fiji and Nepal?
- 0 hectares per person, with Fiji ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Nepal?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2025.
- How do Fiji and Nepal rank globally for wildfire area burned by land cover type, per capita?
- Fiji ranks 97th and Nepal ranks 97th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Wildfire area burned by land cover type, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Wildfire area burned by land cover type divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.