Chile vs Costa Rica: Wildfire area burned by land cover type, per capita
Chile
0 hectares per person
in 2025
Costa Rica
0 hectares per person
in 2025
Chile rank
77th
Costa Rica rank
78th
Wildfire area burned by land cover type, per capita over time
- Chile
- Costa Rica
How they compare
Chile currently reports 0 hectares per person against 0 hectares per person in Costa Rica, a difference of 0 hectares per person.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.3 times Costa Rica's.
The two have swapped places 14 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 77th and Costa Rica ranks 78th of 206 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Costa Rica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | Chile |
| 2010s | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | Chile |
| 2020s | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wildfire area burned by land cover type, per capita, Chile or Costa Rica?
- Chile, at 0 hectares per person against 0 hectares per person in Costa Rica as of 2025.
- What is the difference in wildfire area burned by land cover type, per capita between Chile and Costa Rica?
- 0 hectares per person, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Costa Rica?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2025.
- How do Chile and Costa Rica rank globally for wildfire area burned by land cover type, per capita?
- Chile ranks 77th and Costa Rica ranks 78th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Wildfire area burned by land cover type, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Wildfire area burned by land cover type divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.