Bhutan vs Togo: Wildfire area burned by land cover type, per capita
Bhutan
0 hectares per person
in 2025
Togo
0 hectares per person
in 2025
Bhutan rank
97th
Togo rank
97th
Wildfire area burned by land cover type, per capita over time
- Bhutan
- Togo
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 0 hectares per person against 0 hectares per person in Togo, a difference of 0 hectares per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Bhutan ahead.
Bhutan ranks 97th and Togo ranks 97th of 206 countries.
Togo has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | Togo |
| 2010s | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | Togo |
| 2020s | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | Togo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wildfire area burned by land cover type, per capita, Bhutan or Togo?
- Bhutan, at 0 hectares per person against 0 hectares per person in Togo as of 2025.
- What is the difference in wildfire area burned by land cover type, per capita between Bhutan and Togo?
- 0 hectares per person, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Togo?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2025.
- How do Bhutan and Togo rank globally for wildfire area burned by land cover type, per capita?
- Bhutan ranks 97th and Togo ranks 97th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Wildfire area burned by land cover type, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Wildfire area burned by land cover type divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.