South Africa vs Zimbabwe: Wildfire area burned by land cover type, annual growth rate

South Africa
-55.91 % change on previous year
in 2025
Zimbabwe
-56.25 % change on previous year
in 2025
South Africa rank
54th
Zimbabwe rank
55th

Wildfire area burned by land cover type, annual growth rate over time

  • South Africa
  • Zimbabwe
-1000100200300400200320142025

How they compare

South Africa currently reports -55.91 % change on previous year against -56.25 % change on previous year in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.34 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

South Africa ranks 54th and Zimbabwe ranks 55th of 117 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, South Africa averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Africa Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s -2 % change on previous year 44.18 % change on previous year 46.18 % change on previous year Zimbabwe
2010s 13.59 % change on previous year 42.72 % change on previous year 29.14 % change on previous year Zimbabwe
2020s 36.64 % change on previous year 29.46 % change on previous year 7.18 % change on previous year South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher wildfire area burned by land cover type, annual growth rate, South Africa or Zimbabwe?
South Africa, at -55.91 % change on previous year against -56.25 % change on previous year in Zimbabwe as of 2025.
What is the difference in wildfire area burned by land cover type, annual growth rate between South Africa and Zimbabwe?
0.34 % change on previous year, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Zimbabwe?
23 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2025.
How do South Africa and Zimbabwe rank globally for wildfire area burned by land cover type, annual growth rate?
South Africa ranks 54th and Zimbabwe ranks 55th of 117 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Wildfire area burned by land cover type, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Africa vs Zimbabwe: Wildfire area burned by land cover type, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/wildfire-area-burned-by-land-cover-type-annual-growth-rate/south-africa/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/wildfire-area-burned-by-land-cover-type-annual-growth-rate/south-africa/zimbabwe/">South Africa vs Zimbabwe: Wildfire area burned by land cover type, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Wildfire area burned by land cover type, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
117 places, 2,052 data points, 2003–2025
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Wildfire area burned by land cover type. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.