Mali vs Namibia: Wealth per capita by asset group
Mali
8,266 $
in 2014
Namibia
8,027 $
in 2014
Mali rank
23rd
Namibia rank
26th
Wealth per capita by asset group over time
- Mali
- Namibia
How they compare
Mali currently reports 8,266 $ against 8,027 $ in Namibia, a difference of 239 $.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Namibia ahead.
Mali ranks 23rd and Namibia ranks 26th of 141 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Mali averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mali | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6,335 $ | 11,401 $ | 5,066 $ | Namibia |
| 2000s | 6,196 $ | 7,252 $ | 1,056 $ | Namibia |
| 2010s | 8,420 $ | 8,313 $ | 106.54 $ | Mali |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wealth per capita by asset group, Mali or Namibia?
- Mali, at 8,266 $ against 8,027 $ in Namibia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in wealth per capita by asset group between Mali and Namibia?
- 239 $, with Mali ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Namibia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2014.
- How do Mali and Namibia rank globally for wealth per capita by asset group?
- Mali ranks 23rd and Namibia ranks 26th of 141 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank (2017) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Wealth per capita by asset group. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Natural capital is disaggregated here into its constituent parts: timber, non-timber, protected areas, land, and sub-soil assets (i.e., fossil fuels, metals and minerals).