Hungary vs Zimbabwe: Wealth per capita by asset group
Hungary
3,610 $
in 2014
Zimbabwe
3,583 $
in 2014
Hungary rank
105th
Zimbabwe rank
106th
Wealth per capita by asset group over time
- Hungary
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Hungary currently reports 3,610 $ against 3,583 $ in Zimbabwe, a difference of 27 $.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Hungary ahead.
Hungary ranks 105th and Zimbabwe ranks 106th of 141 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Hungary averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4,050 $ | 3,330 $ | 719.48 $ | Hungary |
| 2000s | 3,312 $ | 3,415 $ | 102.81 $ | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 3,402 $ | 4,123 $ | 720.77 $ | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wealth per capita by asset group, Hungary or Zimbabwe?
- Hungary, at 3,610 $ against 3,583 $ in Zimbabwe as of 2014.
- What is the difference in wealth per capita by asset group between Hungary and Zimbabwe?
- 27 $, with Hungary ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Zimbabwe?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2014.
- How do Hungary and Zimbabwe rank globally for wealth per capita by asset group?
- Hungary ranks 105th and Zimbabwe ranks 106th of 141 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank (2017) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Wealth per capita by asset group. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Natural capital is disaggregated here into its constituent parts: timber, non-timber, protected areas, land, and sub-soil assets (i.e., fossil fuels, metals and minerals).