Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Norway: Wealth per capita by asset group
Bosnia and Herzegovina
4,794 $
in 2014
Norway
4,802 $
in 2014
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
81st
Norway rank
80th
Wealth per capita by asset group over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Norway
How they compare
Norway currently reports 4,802 $ against 4,794 $ in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 8 $.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Norway has been ahead every year.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 81st and Norway ranks 80th of 141 countries.
Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2,923 $ | 10,644 $ | 7,720 $ | Norway |
| 2000s | 3,986 $ | 7,428 $ | 3,442 $ | Norway |
| 2010s | 4,678 $ | 5,091 $ | 412.99 $ | Norway |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wealth per capita by asset group, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Norway?
- Norway, at 4,802 $ against 4,794 $ in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2014.
- What is the difference in wealth per capita by asset group between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Norway?
- 8 $, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Norway?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2014.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Norway rank globally for wealth per capita by asset group?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 81st and Norway ranks 80th of 141 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank (2017) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Wealth per capita by asset group. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Natural capital is disaggregated here into its constituent parts: timber, non-timber, protected areas, land, and sub-soil assets (i.e., fossil fuels, metals and minerals).