Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Italy: Wealth per capita by asset group
Bosnia and Herzegovina
4,794 $
in 2014
Italy
4,816 $
in 2014
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
81st
Italy rank
78th
Wealth per capita by asset group over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Italy
How they compare
Italy currently reports 4,816 $ against 4,794 $ in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 22 $.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Italy has been ahead every year.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 81st and Italy ranks 78th of 141 countries.
Italy has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Italy | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2,923 $ | 7,281 $ | 4,357 $ | Italy |
| 2000s | 3,986 $ | 5,971 $ | 1,985 $ | Italy |
| 2010s | 4,678 $ | 4,910 $ | 231.81 $ | Italy |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wealth per capita by asset group, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Italy?
- Italy, at 4,816 $ against 4,794 $ in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2014.
- What is the difference in wealth per capita by asset group between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Italy?
- 22 $, with Italy ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Italy?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2014.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Italy rank globally for wealth per capita by asset group?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 81st and Italy ranks 78th of 141 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank (2017) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Wealth per capita by asset group. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Natural capital is disaggregated here into its constituent parts: timber, non-timber, protected areas, land, and sub-soil assets (i.e., fossil fuels, metals and minerals).