Australia vs Kazakhstan: Wealth per capita by asset group
Australia
11,899 $
in 2014
Kazakhstan
12,694 $
in 2014
Australia rank
11th
Kazakhstan rank
9th
Wealth per capita by asset group over time
- Australia
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 12,694 $ against 11,899 $ in Australia, a difference of 795 $.
That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.1 times Australia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Australia ranks 11th and Kazakhstan ranks 9th of 141 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and Kazakhstan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 14,840 $ | 20,293 $ | 5,453 $ | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 15,445 $ | 14,903 $ | 542.3 $ | Australia |
| 2010s | 12,288 $ | 12,925 $ | 636.65 $ | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wealth per capita by asset group, Australia or Kazakhstan?
- Kazakhstan, at 12,694 $ against 11,899 $ in Australia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in wealth per capita by asset group between Australia and Kazakhstan?
- 795 $, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Kazakhstan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2014.
- How do Australia and Kazakhstan rank globally for wealth per capita by asset group?
- Australia ranks 11th and Kazakhstan ranks 9th of 141 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank (2017) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Wealth per capita by asset group. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Natural capital is disaggregated here into its constituent parts: timber, non-timber, protected areas, land, and sub-soil assets (i.e., fossil fuels, metals and minerals).