Belgium vs South Africa: Wage workers, aged 15-64, urban
Belgium
0.9%
in 2003
South Africa
0.8%
in 2020
Belgium rank
31st
South Africa rank
34th
Wage workers, aged 15-64, urban over time
- Belgium
- South Africa
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 0.9% against 0.8% in South Africa, a difference of 0.1%.
Across all 5 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.
Belgium ranks 31st and South Africa ranks 34th of 94 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.8% | 0.9% | 0.0% | South Africa |
| 2000s | 0.9% | 1.0% | 0.1% | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wage workers, aged 15-64, urban, Belgium or South Africa?
- Belgium, at 0.9% against 0.8% in South Africa as of 2003.
- What is the difference in wage workers, aged 15-64, urban between Belgium and South Africa?
- 0.1%, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and South Africa?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2003.
- How do Belgium and South Africa rank globally for wage workers, aged 15-64, urban?
- Belgium ranks 31st and South Africa ranks 34th of 94 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Wage workers, aged 15-64, urban (% of urban employed population in working age). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.