Kiribati vs Monaco: Voice and Accountability - Upper bound of the 90% confidence interval
Kiribati
83.0%
in 2024
Monaco
83.5%
in 2024
Kiribati rank
34th
Monaco rank
32nd
Voice and Accountability - Upper bound of the 90% confidence interval over time
- Kiribati
- Monaco
How they compare
Monaco currently reports 83.5% against 83.0% in Kiribati, a difference of 0.5%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Kiribati ahead.
Kiribati ranks 34th and Monaco ranks 32nd of 208 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 1 and Monaco in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Monaco | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 88.5% | 87.3% | 1.2% | Kiribati |
| 2000s | 75.0% | 83.8% | 8.8% | Monaco |
| 2010s | 76.0% | 81.3% | 5.3% | Monaco |
| 2020s | 82.9% | 84.1% | 1.3% | Monaco |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - upper bound of the 90% confidence interval, Kiribati or Monaco?
- Monaco, at 83.5% against 83.0% in Kiribati as of 2024.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - upper bound of the 90% confidence interval between Kiribati and Monaco?
- 0.5%, with Monaco ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Monaco?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Kiribati and Monaco rank globally for voice and accountability - upper bound of the 90% confidence interval?
- Kiribati ranks 34th and Monaco ranks 32nd of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Voice and Accountability - Upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.