Sierra Leone vs Tunisia: Voice and Accountability
Sierra Leone
0.117 standard error
in 2011
Tunisia
0.1158 standard error
in 2011
Sierra Leone rank
28th
Tunisia rank
31st
Voice and Accountability over time
- Sierra Leone
- Tunisia
How they compare
Sierra Leone currently reports 0.117 standard error against 0.1158 standard error in Tunisia, a difference of 0.0012 standard error.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Sierra Leone has been ahead every year.
Sierra Leone ranks 28th and Tunisia ranks 31st of 53 countries.
Sierra Leone has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sierra Leone | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2637 standard error | 0.2265 standard error | 0.0372 standard error | Sierra Leone |
| 2000s | 0.1533 standard error | 0.1423 standard error | 0.0109 standard error | Sierra Leone |
| 2010s | 0.1165 standard error | 0.1141 standard error | 0.0024 standard error | Sierra Leone |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability, Sierra Leone or Tunisia?
- Sierra Leone, at 0.117 standard error against 0.1158 standard error in Tunisia as of 2011.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability between Sierra Leone and Tunisia?
- 0.0012 standard error, with Sierra Leone ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sierra Leone and Tunisia?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
- How do Sierra Leone and Tunisia rank globally for voice and accountability?
- Sierra Leone ranks 28th and Tunisia ranks 31st of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank Institute, published as Voice and Accountability (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
See definition GV.VOIC.AC.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.