Malawi vs Tunisia: Voice and Accountability
Voice and Accountability over time
- Malawi
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 0.1158 standard error against 0.1139 standard error in Malawi, a difference of 0.0019 standard error.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Tunisia ahead.
Malawi ranks 33rd and Tunisia ranks 31st of 53 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Malawi averaged higher in 1 and Tunisia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2265 standard error | 0.2265 standard error | 0 standard error | — |
| 2000s | 0.144 standard error | 0.1423 standard error | 0.0017 standard error | Malawi |
| 2010s | 0.1134 standard error | 0.1141 standard error | 0.0007 standard error | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability, Malawi or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 0.1158 standard error against 0.1139 standard error in Malawi as of 2011.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability between Malawi and Tunisia?
- 0.0019 standard error, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Tunisia?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
- How do Malawi and Tunisia rank globally for voice and accountability?
- Malawi ranks 33rd and Tunisia ranks 31st of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank Institute, published as Voice and Accountability (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
See definition GV.VOIC.AC.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.