Malawi vs Mauritania: Voice and Accountability
Malawi
0.1139 standard error
in 2011
Mauritania
0.1163 standard error
in 2011
Malawi rank
33rd
Mauritania rank
30th
Voice and Accountability over time
- Malawi
- Mauritania
How they compare
Mauritania currently reports 0.1163 standard error against 0.1139 standard error in Malawi, a difference of 0.0024 standard error.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Mauritania has been ahead every year.
Malawi ranks 33rd and Mauritania ranks 30th of 53 countries.
Mauritania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Mauritania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2265 standard error | 0.298 standard error | 0.0716 standard error | Mauritania |
| 2000s | 0.144 standard error | 0.1728 standard error | 0.0288 standard error | Mauritania |
| 2010s | 0.1134 standard error | 0.1157 standard error | 0.0023 standard error | Mauritania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability, Malawi or Mauritania?
- Mauritania, at 0.1163 standard error against 0.1139 standard error in Malawi as of 2011.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability between Malawi and Mauritania?
- 0.0024 standard error, with Mauritania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Mauritania?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
- How do Malawi and Mauritania rank globally for voice and accountability?
- Malawi ranks 33rd and Mauritania ranks 30th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank Institute, published as Voice and Accountability (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
See definition GV.VOIC.AC.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.