Libya vs Tunisia: Voice and Accountability
Libya
0.1168 standard error
in 2011
Tunisia
0.1158 standard error
in 2011
Libya rank
29th
Tunisia rank
31st
Voice and Accountability over time
- Libya
- Tunisia
How they compare
Libya currently reports 0.1168 standard error against 0.1158 standard error in Tunisia, a difference of 0.001 standard error.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Tunisia ahead.
Libya ranks 29th and Tunisia ranks 31st of 53 countries.
Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2265 standard error | 0.2265 standard error | 0 standard error | — |
| 2000s | 0.1456 standard error | 0.1423 standard error | 0.0033 standard error | Libya |
| 2010s | 0.1147 standard error | 0.1141 standard error | 0.0007 standard error | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability, Libya or Tunisia?
- Libya, at 0.1168 standard error against 0.1158 standard error in Tunisia as of 2011.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability between Libya and Tunisia?
- 0.001 standard error, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Tunisia?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
- How do Libya and Tunisia rank globally for voice and accountability?
- Libya ranks 29th and Tunisia ranks 31st of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank Institute, published as Voice and Accountability (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
See definition GV.VOIC.AC.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.