Gambia vs Guinea-Bissau: Voice and Accountability
Gambia
0.148 standard error
in 2011
Guinea-Bissau
0.1546 standard error
in 2011
Gambia rank
8th
Guinea-Bissau rank
6th
Voice and Accountability over time
- Gambia
- Guinea-Bissau
How they compare
Guinea-Bissau currently reports 0.1546 standard error against 0.148 standard error in Gambia, a difference of 0.0066 standard error.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Guinea-Bissau has been ahead every year.
Gambia ranks 8th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 6th of 53 countries.
Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gambia | Guinea-Bissau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2523 standard error | 0.2637 standard error | 0.0113 standard error | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2000s | 0.1831 standard error | 0.1908 standard error | 0.0077 standard error | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2010s | 0.1491 standard error | 0.1562 standard error | 0.0072 standard error | Guinea-Bissau |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability, Gambia or Guinea-Bissau?
- Guinea-Bissau, at 0.1546 standard error against 0.148 standard error in Gambia as of 2011.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability between Gambia and Guinea-Bissau?
- 0.0066 standard error, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Guinea-Bissau?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
- How do Gambia and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for voice and accountability?
- Gambia ranks 8th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 6th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank Institute, published as Voice and Accountability (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
See definition GV.VOIC.AC.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.