Equatorial Guinea vs Lesotho: Voice and Accountability
Voice and Accountability over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Lesotho
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0.1524 standard error against 0.1426 standard error in Lesotho, a difference of 0.0098 standard error.
That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Lesotho's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Lesotho ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 7th and Lesotho ranks 9th of 53 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Lesotho in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Lesotho | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2579 standard error | 0.3154 standard error | 0.0575 standard error | Lesotho |
| 2000s | 0.1838 standard error | 0.1973 standard error | 0.0135 standard error | Lesotho |
| 2010s | 0.1533 standard error | 0.1433 standard error | 0.01 standard error | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability, Equatorial Guinea or Lesotho?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 0.1524 standard error against 0.1426 standard error in Lesotho as of 2011.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability between Equatorial Guinea and Lesotho?
- 0.0098 standard error, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Lesotho?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Lesotho rank globally for voice and accountability?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 7th and Lesotho ranks 9th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank Institute, published as Voice and Accountability (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
See definition GV.VOIC.AC.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.