Equatorial Guinea vs Guinea-Bissau: Voice and Accountability
Voice and Accountability over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Guinea-Bissau
How they compare
Guinea-Bissau currently reports 0.1546 standard error against 0.1524 standard error in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.0022 standard error.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 7th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 6th of 53 countries.
Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Guinea-Bissau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2579 standard error | 0.2637 standard error | 0.0058 standard error | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2000s | 0.1838 standard error | 0.1908 standard error | 0.007 standard error | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2010s | 0.1533 standard error | 0.1562 standard error | 0.0029 standard error | Guinea-Bissau |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability, Equatorial Guinea or Guinea-Bissau?
- Guinea-Bissau, at 0.1546 standard error against 0.1524 standard error in Equatorial Guinea as of 2011.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability between Equatorial Guinea and Guinea-Bissau?
- 0.0022 standard error, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Guinea-Bissau?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for voice and accountability?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 7th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 6th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank Institute, published as Voice and Accountability (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
See definition GV.VOIC.AC.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.