Equatorial Guinea vs Gabon: Voice and Accountability
Voice and Accountability over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Gabon
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0.1524 standard error against 0.1403 standard error in Gabon, a difference of 0.0121 standard error.
That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Gabon's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 7th and Gabon ranks 10th of 53 countries.
Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Gabon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2579 standard error | 0.2265 standard error | 0.0314 standard error | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2000s | 0.1838 standard error | 0.1707 standard error | 0.0132 standard error | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2010s | 0.1533 standard error | 0.1405 standard error | 0.0128 standard error | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability, Equatorial Guinea or Gabon?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 0.1524 standard error against 0.1403 standard error in Gabon as of 2011.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability between Equatorial Guinea and Gabon?
- 0.0121 standard error, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Gabon?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Gabon rank globally for voice and accountability?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 7th and Gabon ranks 10th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank Institute, published as Voice and Accountability (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
See definition GV.VOIC.AC.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.