Cote d'Ivoire vs Malawi: Voice and Accountability
Voice and Accountability over time
- Cote d'Ivoire
- Malawi
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 0.1139 standard error against 0.1135 standard error in Cote d'Ivoire, a difference of 0.0004 standard error.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Malawi ahead.
Cote d'Ivoire ranks 35th and Malawi ranks 33rd of 53 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Cote d'Ivoire averaged higher in 1 and Malawi in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cote d'Ivoire | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2265 standard error | 0.2265 standard error | 0 standard error | — |
| 2000s | 0.1522 standard error | 0.144 standard error | 0.0082 standard error | Cote d'Ivoire |
| 2010s | 0.1129 standard error | 0.1134 standard error | 0.0005 standard error | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability, Cote d'Ivoire or Malawi?
- Malawi, at 0.1139 standard error against 0.1135 standard error in Cote d'Ivoire as of 2011.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability between Cote d'Ivoire and Malawi?
- 0.0004 standard error, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and Malawi?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
- How do Cote d'Ivoire and Malawi rank globally for voice and accountability?
- Cote d'Ivoire ranks 35th and Malawi ranks 33rd of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank Institute, published as Voice and Accountability (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
See definition GV.VOIC.AC.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.