Cote d'Ivoire vs Liberia: Voice and Accountability
Voice and Accountability over time
- Cote d'Ivoire
- Liberia
How they compare
Liberia currently reports 0.1144 standard error against 0.1135 standard error in Cote d'Ivoire, a difference of 0.0009 standard error.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Liberia ahead.
Cote d'Ivoire ranks 35th and Liberia ranks 32nd of 53 countries.
Liberia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cote d'Ivoire | Liberia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2265 standard error | 0.2523 standard error | 0.0259 standard error | Liberia |
| 2000s | 0.1522 standard error | 0.1635 standard error | 0.0112 standard error | Liberia |
| 2010s | 0.1129 standard error | 0.1138 standard error | 0.0009 standard error | Liberia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability, Cote d'Ivoire or Liberia?
- Liberia, at 0.1144 standard error against 0.1135 standard error in Cote d'Ivoire as of 2011.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability between Cote d'Ivoire and Liberia?
- 0.0009 standard error, with Liberia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and Liberia?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
- How do Cote d'Ivoire and Liberia rank globally for voice and accountability?
- Cote d'Ivoire ranks 35th and Liberia ranks 32nd of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank Institute, published as Voice and Accountability (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
See definition GV.VOIC.AC.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.