Comoros vs Guinea-Bissau: Voice and Accountability
Comoros
0.162 standard error
in 2011
Guinea-Bissau
0.1546 standard error
in 2011
Comoros rank
3rd
Guinea-Bissau rank
6th
Voice and Accountability over time
- Comoros
- Guinea-Bissau
How they compare
Comoros currently reports 0.162 standard error against 0.1546 standard error in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 0.0074 standard error.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Comoros has been ahead every year.
Comoros ranks 3rd and Guinea-Bissau ranks 6th of 53 countries.
Comoros has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Guinea-Bissau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.298 standard error | 0.2637 standard error | 0.0343 standard error | Comoros |
| 2000s | 0.2062 standard error | 0.1908 standard error | 0.0154 standard error | Comoros |
| 2010s | 0.1638 standard error | 0.1562 standard error | 0.0076 standard error | Comoros |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability, Comoros or Guinea-Bissau?
- Comoros, at 0.162 standard error against 0.1546 standard error in Guinea-Bissau as of 2011.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability between Comoros and Guinea-Bissau?
- 0.0074 standard error, with Comoros ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Guinea-Bissau?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
- How do Comoros and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for voice and accountability?
- Comoros ranks 3rd and Guinea-Bissau ranks 6th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank Institute, published as Voice and Accountability (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
See definition GV.VOIC.AC.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.