Central African Republic vs Chad: Voice and Accountability
Voice and Accountability over time
- Central African Republic
- Chad
How they compare
Central African Republic currently reports 0.1336 standard error against 0.1306 standard error in Chad, a difference of 0.003 standard error.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Chad ahead.
Central African Republic ranks 16th and Chad ranks 18th of 53 countries.
Central African Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Chad | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.298 standard error | 0.298 standard error | 0 standard error | — |
| 2000s | 0.1768 standard error | 0.1698 standard error | 0.007 standard error | Central African Republic |
| 2010s | 0.1334 standard error | 0.1305 standard error | 0.0029 standard error | Central African Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability, Central African Republic or Chad?
- Central African Republic, at 0.1336 standard error against 0.1306 standard error in Chad as of 2011.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability between Central African Republic and Chad?
- 0.003 standard error, with Central African Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Chad?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
- How do Central African Republic and Chad rank globally for voice and accountability?
- Central African Republic ranks 16th and Chad ranks 18th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank Institute, published as Voice and Accountability (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
See definition GV.VOIC.AC.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.