Cape Verde vs Sao Tome and Principe: Voice and Accountability
Voice and Accountability over time
- Cape Verde
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 0.162 standard error against 0.1577 standard error in Cape Verde, a difference of 0.0043 standard error.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Cape Verde ahead.
Cape Verde ranks 4th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 2nd of 53 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Cape Verde averaged higher in 1 and Sao Tome and Principe in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.3793 standard error | 0.298 standard error | 0.0813 standard error | Cape Verde |
| 2000s | 0.2081 standard error | 0.2107 standard error | 0.0026 standard error | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 2010s | 0.1593 standard error | 0.1639 standard error | 0.0046 standard error | Sao Tome and Principe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability, Cape Verde or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Sao Tome and Principe, at 0.162 standard error against 0.1577 standard error in Cape Verde as of 2011.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability between Cape Verde and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 0.0043 standard error, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
- How do Cape Verde and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for voice and accountability?
- Cape Verde ranks 4th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 2nd of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank Institute, published as Voice and Accountability (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
See definition GV.VOIC.AC.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.