Cape Verde vs Equatorial Guinea: Voice and Accountability
Voice and Accountability over time
- Cape Verde
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Cape Verde currently reports 0.1577 standard error against 0.1524 standard error in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.0053 standard error.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Cape Verde has been ahead every year.
Cape Verde ranks 4th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 7th of 53 countries.
Cape Verde has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Equatorial Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.3793 standard error | 0.2579 standard error | 0.1214 standard error | Cape Verde |
| 2000s | 0.2081 standard error | 0.1838 standard error | 0.0243 standard error | Cape Verde |
| 2010s | 0.1593 standard error | 0.1533 standard error | 0.006 standard error | Cape Verde |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability, Cape Verde or Equatorial Guinea?
- Cape Verde, at 0.1577 standard error against 0.1524 standard error in Equatorial Guinea as of 2011.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability between Cape Verde and Equatorial Guinea?
- 0.0053 standard error, with Cape Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Equatorial Guinea?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
- How do Cape Verde and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for voice and accountability?
- Cape Verde ranks 4th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 7th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank Institute, published as Voice and Accountability (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
See definition GV.VOIC.AC.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.