Botswana vs Rwanda: Voice and Accountability
Voice and Accountability over time
- Botswana
- Rwanda
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 0.1251 standard error against 0.118 standard error in Rwanda, a difference of 0.0071 standard error.
That makes Botswana's figure about 1.1 times Rwanda's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Rwanda ahead.
Botswana ranks 24th and Rwanda ranks 27th of 53 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2265 standard error | 0.298 standard error | 0.0716 standard error | Rwanda |
| 2000s | 0.1501 standard error | 0.1638 standard error | 0.0136 standard error | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 0.1248 standard error | 0.1175 standard error | 0.0073 standard error | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability, Botswana or Rwanda?
- Botswana, at 0.1251 standard error against 0.118 standard error in Rwanda as of 2011.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability between Botswana and Rwanda?
- 0.0071 standard error, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Rwanda?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
- How do Botswana and Rwanda rank globally for voice and accountability?
- Botswana ranks 24th and Rwanda ranks 27th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank Institute, published as Voice and Accountability (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
See definition GV.VOIC.AC.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.