New Zealand vs Sweden: Voice and Accountability - Lower bound of the 90% confidence interval
New Zealand
81.7%
in 2024
Sweden
82.4%
in 2024
New Zealand rank
5th
Sweden rank
4th
Voice and Accountability - Lower bound of the 90% confidence interval over time
- New Zealand
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 82.4% against 81.7% in New Zealand, a difference of 0.7%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Sweden ahead.
New Zealand ranks 5th and Sweden ranks 4th of 208 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 77.7% | 80.3% | 2.6% | Sweden |
| 2000s | 79.4% | 81.6% | 2.2% | Sweden |
| 2010s | 83.1% | 83.5% | 0.5% | Sweden |
| 2020s | 82.4% | 82.9% | 0.5% | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - lower bound of the 90% confidence interval, New Zealand or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 82.4% against 81.7% in New Zealand as of 2024.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - lower bound of the 90% confidence interval between New Zealand and Sweden?
- 0.7%, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Sweden?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do New Zealand and Sweden rank globally for voice and accountability - lower bound of the 90% confidence interval?
- New Zealand ranks 5th and Sweden ranks 4th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Voice and Accountability - Lower bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.