Ecuador vs Malaysia: Voice and Accountability - Lower bound of the 90% confidence interval
Ecuador
50.5%
in 2024
Malaysia
50.2%
in 2024
Ecuador rank
110th
Malaysia rank
112th
Voice and Accountability - Lower bound of the 90% confidence interval over time
- Ecuador
- Malaysia
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 50.5% against 50.2% in Malaysia, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 110th and Malaysia ranks 112th of 208 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 48.9% | 40.0% | 8.9% | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 49.7% | 44.0% | 5.7% | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 47.8% | 47.1% | 0.7% | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 50.4% | 49.5% | 0.9% | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - lower bound of the 90% confidence interval, Ecuador or Malaysia?
- Ecuador, at 50.5% against 50.2% in Malaysia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - lower bound of the 90% confidence interval between Ecuador and Malaysia?
- 0.3%, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Malaysia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Ecuador and Malaysia rank globally for voice and accountability - lower bound of the 90% confidence interval?
- Ecuador ranks 110th and Malaysia ranks 112th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Voice and Accountability - Lower bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.