Tonga vs United States Virgin Islands: Voice and Accountability - Governance score
Voice and Accountability - Governance score over time
- Tonga
- United States Virgin Islands
How they compare
United States Virgin Islands currently reports 71.43 0-100 against 71.21 0-100 in Tonga, a difference of 0.22 0-100.
Across all 14 years both countries report, United States Virgin Islands has been ahead every year.
Tonga ranks 52nd and United States Virgin Islands ranks 51st of 206 countries.
United States Virgin Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Tonga | United States Virgin Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 57 0-100 | 71.06 0-100 | 14.06 0-100 | United States Virgin Islands |
| 2010s | 63.47 0-100 | 71.46 0-100 | 7.99 0-100 | United States Virgin Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance score, Tonga or United States Virgin Islands?
- United States Virgin Islands, at 71.43 0-100 against 71.21 0-100 in Tonga as of 2017.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance score between Tonga and United States Virgin Islands?
- 0.22 0-100, with United States Virgin Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Tonga and United States Virgin Islands?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2017.
- How do Tonga and United States Virgin Islands rank globally for voice and accountability - governance score?
- Tonga ranks 52nd and United States Virgin Islands ranks 51st of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).