Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Trinidad and Tobago: Voice and Accountability - Governance score

Saint Kitts and Nevis
64.9 0-100
in 2024
Trinidad and Tobago
63.96 0-100
in 2024
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
68th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
70th

Voice and Accountability - Governance score over time

  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
  • Trinidad and Tobago
020406080199620102024

How they compare

Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 64.9 0-100 against 63.96 0-100 in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.94 0-100.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.

Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 68th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 70th of 207 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Saint Kitts and Nevis averaged higher in 3 and Trinidad and Tobago in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Saint Kitts and Nevis Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1990s 75.08 0-100 68.96 0-100 6.12 0-100 Saint Kitts and Nevis
2000s 74.47 0-100 66.36 0-100 8.11 0-100 Saint Kitts and Nevis
2010s 71.82 0-100 66.19 0-100 5.63 0-100 Saint Kitts and Nevis
2020s 64.52 0-100 64.69 0-100 0.1732 0-100 Trinidad and Tobago

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance score, Saint Kitts and Nevis or Trinidad and Tobago?
Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 64.9 0-100 against 63.96 0-100 in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2024.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance score between Saint Kitts and Nevis and Trinidad and Tobago?
0.94 0-100, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Kitts and Nevis and Trinidad and Tobago?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Saint Kitts and Nevis and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for voice and accountability - governance score?
Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 68th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 70th of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Trinidad and Tobago: Voice and Accountability - Governance score. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-score-0-100/st-kitts-and-nevis/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-score-0-100/st-kitts-and-nevis/trinidad-and-tobago/">Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Trinidad and Tobago: Voice and Accountability - Governance score</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100)
Unit
0-100
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
207 places, 5,285 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).