Poland vs Tonga: Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100)
Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) over time
- Poland
- Tonga
How they compare
Poland currently reports 72.75 0-100 against 72.51 0-100 in Tonga, a difference of 0.24 0-100.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Poland ahead.
Poland ranks 53rd and Tonga ranks 55th of 208 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Poland averaged higher in 3 and Tonga in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Poland | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 75.35 0-100 | 58.73 0-100 | 16.62 0-100 | Poland |
| 2000s | 75.35 0-100 | 57.92 0-100 | 17.43 0-100 | Poland |
| 2010s | 74.15 0-100 | 65.78 0-100 | 8.37 0-100 | Poland |
| 2020s | 67.96 0-100 | 73.8 0-100 | 5.84 0-100 | Tonga |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance score, Poland or Tonga?
- Poland, at 72.75 0-100 against 72.51 0-100 in Tonga as of 2025.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance score between Poland and Tonga?
- 0.24 0-100, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Tonga?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
- How do Poland and Tonga rank globally for voice and accountability - governance score?
- Poland ranks 53rd and Tonga ranks 55th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).