Nicaragua vs South Sudan: Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100)
Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) over time
- Nicaragua
- South Sudan
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 25.39 0-100 against 23.44 0-100 in South Sudan, a difference of 1.95 0-100.
That makes Nicaragua's figure about 1.1 times South Sudan's.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Nicaragua has been ahead every year.
Nicaragua ranks 200th and South Sudan ranks 202nd of 208 countries.
Nicaragua has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nicaragua | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 44.31 0-100 | 28.58 0-100 | 15.73 0-100 | Nicaragua |
| 2020s | 29.95 0-100 | 24.25 0-100 | 5.7 0-100 | Nicaragua |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance score, Nicaragua or South Sudan?
- Nicaragua, at 25.39 0-100 against 23.44 0-100 in South Sudan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance score between Nicaragua and South Sudan?
- 1.95 0-100, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and South Sudan?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2025.
- How do Nicaragua and South Sudan rank globally for voice and accountability - governance score?
- Nicaragua ranks 200th and South Sudan ranks 202nd of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).