Myanmar vs South Sudan: Voice and Accountability - Governance score
Voice and Accountability - Governance score over time
- Myanmar
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 23.74 0-100 against 19.66 0-100 in Myanmar, a difference of 4.08 0-100.
That makes South Sudan's figure about 1.2 times Myanmar's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2011 it was South Sudan ahead.
Myanmar ranks 204th and South Sudan ranks 201st of 206 countries.
Myanmar has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Myanmar | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 35.56 0-100 | 27.99 0-100 | 7.57 0-100 | Myanmar |
| 2020s | 27.79 0-100 | 23.32 0-100 | 4.47 0-100 | Myanmar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance score, Myanmar or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 23.74 0-100 against 19.66 0-100 in Myanmar as of 2024.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance score between Myanmar and South Sudan?
- 4.08 0-100, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and South Sudan?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2024.
- How do Myanmar and South Sudan rank globally for voice and accountability - governance score?
- Myanmar ranks 204th and South Sudan ranks 201st of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).