Montenegro vs East Timor: Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100)
Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) over time
- Montenegro
- East Timor
How they compare
East Timor currently reports 65.66 0-100 against 65.03 0-100 in Montenegro, a difference of 0.63 0-100.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Montenegro ahead.
Montenegro ranks 79th and East Timor ranks 77th of 208 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Montenegro averaged higher in 1 and East Timor in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Montenegro | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 49.33 0-100 | 21.84 0-100 | 27.49 0-100 | Montenegro |
| 2000s | 56.76 0-100 | 60.54 0-100 | 3.77 0-100 | East Timor |
| 2010s | 60.77 0-100 | 61.56 0-100 | 0.7919 0-100 | East Timor |
| 2020s | 63.46 0-100 | 65.26 0-100 | 1.8 0-100 | East Timor |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance score, Montenegro or East Timor?
- East Timor, at 65.66 0-100 against 65.03 0-100 in Montenegro as of 2025.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance score between Montenegro and East Timor?
- 0.63 0-100, with East Timor ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Montenegro and East Timor?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2025.
- How do Montenegro and East Timor rank globally for voice and accountability - governance score?
- Montenegro ranks 79th and East Timor ranks 77th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).