Micronesia, Federated States of vs United States of America: Voice and Accountability - Governance score

Micronesia, Federated States of
72.66 0-100
in 2024
United States of America
72.37 0-100
in 2024
Micronesia, Federated States of rank
45th
United States of America rank
48th

Voice and Accountability - Governance score over time

  • Micronesia, Federated States of
  • United States of America
020406080199620102024

How they compare

Micronesia, Federated States of currently reports 72.66 0-100 against 72.37 0-100 in United States of America, a difference of 0.29 0-100.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was United States of America ahead.

Micronesia, Federated States of ranks 45th and United States of America ranks 48th of 206 countries.

United States of America has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Micronesia, Federated States of United States of America Difference Ahead
1990s 75.38 0-100 80.88 0-100 5.5 0-100 United States of America
2000s 73.72 0-100 79.79 0-100 6.06 0-100 United States of America
2010s 72.14 0-100 77.66 0-100 5.51 0-100 United States of America
2020s 68.97 0-100 72.66 0-100 3.69 0-100 United States of America

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance score, Micronesia, Federated States of or United States of America?
Micronesia, Federated States of, at 72.66 0-100 against 72.37 0-100 in United States of America as of 2024.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance score between Micronesia, Federated States of and United States of America?
0.29 0-100, with Micronesia, Federated States of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia, Federated States of and United States of America?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Micronesia, Federated States of and United States of America rank globally for voice and accountability - governance score?
Micronesia, Federated States of ranks 45th and United States of America ranks 48th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Micronesia, Federated States of vs United States of America: Voice and Accountability - Governance score. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-score-0-100/micronesia-fed-sts/united-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-score-0-100/micronesia-fed-sts/united-states/">Micronesia, Federated States of vs United States of America: Voice and Accountability - Governance score</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100)
Unit
0-100
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,259 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).