Mexico vs Papua New Guinea: Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100)
Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) over time
- Mexico
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 53.4 0-100 against 52.55 0-100 in Mexico, a difference of 0.85 0-100.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.
Mexico ranks 122nd and Papua New Guinea ranks 119th of 208 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Mexico averaged higher in 2 and Papua New Guinea in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mexico | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 55.55 0-100 | 56.49 0-100 | 0.9436 0-100 | Papua New Guinea |
| 2000s | 62.98 0-100 | 54.87 0-100 | 8.11 0-100 | Mexico |
| 2010s | 59.35 0-100 | 56.78 0-100 | 2.57 0-100 | Mexico |
| 2020s | 54.77 0-100 | 55.98 0-100 | 1.21 0-100 | Papua New Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance score, Mexico or Papua New Guinea?
- Papua New Guinea, at 53.4 0-100 against 52.55 0-100 in Mexico as of 2025.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance score between Mexico and Papua New Guinea?
- 0.85 0-100, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Papua New Guinea?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
- How do Mexico and Papua New Guinea rank globally for voice and accountability - governance score?
- Mexico ranks 122nd and Papua New Guinea ranks 119th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).