Lao People's Democratic Republic vs Palestine, State of: Voice and Accountability - Governance score

Lao People's Democratic Republic
31.1 0-100
in 2024
Palestine, State of
33.29 0-100
in 2024
Lao People's Democratic Republic rank
184th
Palestine, State of rank
181st

Voice and Accountability - Governance score over time

  • Lao People's Democratic Republic
  • Palestine, State of
0204060199620102024

How they compare

Palestine, State of currently reports 33.29 0-100 against 31.1 0-100 in Lao People's Democratic Republic, a difference of 2.19 0-100.

That makes Palestine, State of's figure about 1.1 times Lao People's Democratic Republic's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Palestine, State of has been ahead every year.

Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 184th and Palestine, State of ranks 181st of 207 countries.

Palestine, State of has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lao People's Democratic Republic Palestine, State of Difference Ahead
1990s 33.64 0-100 42.71 0-100 9.07 0-100 Palestine, State of
2000s 30.45 0-100 46.37 0-100 15.93 0-100 Palestine, State of
2010s 32.48 0-100 42.1 0-100 9.62 0-100 Palestine, State of
2020s 31.76 0-100 38 0-100 6.24 0-100 Palestine, State of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance score, Lao People's Democratic Republic or Palestine, State of?
Palestine, State of, at 33.29 0-100 against 31.1 0-100 in Lao People's Democratic Republic as of 2024.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance score between Lao People's Democratic Republic and Palestine, State of?
2.19 0-100, with Palestine, State of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lao People's Democratic Republic and Palestine, State of?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Lao People's Democratic Republic and Palestine, State of rank globally for voice and accountability - governance score?
Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 184th and Palestine, State of ranks 181st of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lao People's Democratic Republic vs Palestine, State of: Voice and Accountability - Governance score. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-score-0-100/lao-pdr/west-bank-and-gaza/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-score-0-100/lao-pdr/west-bank-and-gaza/">Lao People's Democratic Republic vs Palestine, State of: Voice and Accountability - Governance score</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100)
Unit
0-100
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
207 places, 5,285 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).