Lao People's Democratic Republic vs Russia: Voice and Accountability - Governance score

Lao People's Democratic Republic
31.1 0-100
in 2024
Russia
31.96 0-100
in 2024
Lao People's Democratic Republic rank
183rd
Russia rank
182nd

Voice and Accountability - Governance score over time

  • Lao People's Democratic Republic
  • Russia
01020304050199620102024

How they compare

Russia currently reports 31.96 0-100 against 31.1 0-100 in Lao People's Democratic Republic, a difference of 0.86 0-100.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Russia has been ahead every year.

Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 183rd and Russia ranks 182nd of 206 countries.

Russia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lao People's Democratic Republic Russia Difference Ahead
1990s 33.64 0-100 48.62 0-100 14.97 0-100 Russia
2000s 30.45 0-100 48.42 0-100 17.97 0-100 Russia
2010s 32.48 0-100 43.4 0-100 10.92 0-100 Russia
2020s 31.76 0-100 36.56 0-100 4.8 0-100 Russia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance score, Lao People's Democratic Republic or Russia?
Russia, at 31.96 0-100 against 31.1 0-100 in Lao People's Democratic Republic as of 2024.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance score between Lao People's Democratic Republic and Russia?
0.86 0-100, with Russia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lao People's Democratic Republic and Russia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Lao People's Democratic Republic and Russia rank globally for voice and accountability - governance score?
Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 183rd and Russia ranks 182nd of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lao People's Democratic Republic vs Russia: Voice and Accountability - Governance score. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-score-0-100/lao-pdr/russian-federation/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-score-0-100/lao-pdr/russian-federation/">Lao People's Democratic Republic vs Russia: Voice and Accountability - Governance score</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100)
Unit
0-100
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,259 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).