Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) vs Lesotho: Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100)

Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
59.15 0-100
in 2025
Lesotho
59.58 0-100
in 2025
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) rank
100th
Lesotho rank
99th

Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) over time

  • Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
  • Lesotho
2030405060199620102025

How they compare

Lesotho currently reports 59.58 0-100 against 59.15 0-100 in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), a difference of 0.43 0-100.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Lesotho ahead.

Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 100th and Lesotho ranks 99th of 208 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) averaged higher in 2 and Lesotho in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) Lesotho Difference Ahead
1990s 23.45 0-100 54.56 0-100 31.11 0-100 Lesotho
2000s 55.59 0-100 59.36 0-100 3.77 0-100 Lesotho
2010s 58.69 0-100 57.31 0-100 1.38 0-100 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
2020s 59.82 0-100 57.93 0-100 1.89 0-100 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance score, Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) or Lesotho?
Lesotho, at 59.58 0-100 against 59.15 0-100 in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) as of 2025.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance score between Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Lesotho?
0.43 0-100, with Lesotho ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Lesotho?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Lesotho rank globally for voice and accountability - governance score?
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 100th and Lesotho ranks 99th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) vs Lesotho: Voice and Accountability - Governance score. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 14 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-score-0-100/kosovo-unscr-1244/lesotho/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-score-0-100/kosovo-unscr-1244/lesotho/">Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) vs Lesotho: Voice and Accountability - Governance score</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100)
Unit
0-100
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,514 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).