French Polynesia vs Tonga: Voice and Accountability - Governance score
Voice and Accountability - Governance score over time
- French Polynesia
- Tonga
How they compare
French Polynesia currently reports 72.19 0-100 against 71.21 0-100 in Tonga, a difference of 0.98 0-100.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2019 it was Tonga ahead.
French Polynesia ranks 49th and Tonga ranks 52nd of 206 countries.
Tonga has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | French Polynesia | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 65.57 0-100 | 68.73 0-100 | 3.16 0-100 | Tonga |
| 2020s | 70.9 0-100 | 72.27 0-100 | 1.37 0-100 | Tonga |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance score, French Polynesia or Tonga?
- French Polynesia, at 72.19 0-100 against 71.21 0-100 in Tonga as of 2024.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance score between French Polynesia and Tonga?
- 0.98 0-100, with French Polynesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for French Polynesia and Tonga?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2024.
- How do French Polynesia and Tonga rank globally for voice and accountability - governance score?
- French Polynesia ranks 49th and Tonga ranks 52nd of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).