Equatorial Guinea vs Syrian Arab Republic: Voice and Accountability - Governance score

Equatorial Guinea
26.65 0-100
in 2024
Syrian Arab Republic
24.52 0-100
in 2024
Equatorial Guinea rank
197th
Syrian Arab Republic rank
199th

Voice and Accountability - Governance score over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Syrian Arab Republic
0102030199620102024

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 26.65 0-100 against 24.52 0-100 in Syrian Arab Republic, a difference of 2.13 0-100.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Syrian Arab Republic's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Syrian Arab Republic ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 197th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 199th of 206 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 2 and Syrian Arab Republic in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Syrian Arab Republic Difference Ahead
1990s 24.29 0-100 27.89 0-100 3.6 0-100 Syrian Arab Republic
2000s 26.01 0-100 28.25 0-100 2.25 0-100 Syrian Arab Republic
2010s 26.33 0-100 23.5 0-100 2.83 0-100 Equatorial Guinea
2020s 26.61 0-100 23.72 0-100 2.89 0-100 Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance score, Equatorial Guinea or Syrian Arab Republic?
Equatorial Guinea, at 26.65 0-100 against 24.52 0-100 in Syrian Arab Republic as of 2024.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance score between Equatorial Guinea and Syrian Arab Republic?
2.13 0-100, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Syrian Arab Republic?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Syrian Arab Republic rank globally for voice and accountability - governance score?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 197th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 199th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Syrian Arab Republic: Voice and Accountability - Governance score. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-score-0-100/equatorial-guinea/syrian-arab-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-score-0-100/equatorial-guinea/syrian-arab-republic/">Equatorial Guinea vs Syrian Arab Republic: Voice and Accountability - Governance score</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100)
Unit
0-100
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,259 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).