Equatorial Guinea vs Sudan: Voice and Accountability - Governance score
Voice and Accountability - Governance score over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Sudan
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 26.65 0-100 against 23.88 0-100 in Sudan, a difference of 2.77 0-100.
That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Sudan's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 197th and Sudan ranks 200th of 206 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 2 and Sudan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 24.29 0-100 | 20.79 0-100 | 3.5 0-100 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2000s | 26.01 0-100 | 26.91 0-100 | 0.8989 0-100 | Sudan |
| 2010s | 26.33 0-100 | 25.78 0-100 | 0.5464 0-100 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2020s | 26.61 0-100 | 27.83 0-100 | 1.21 0-100 | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance score, Equatorial Guinea or Sudan?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 26.65 0-100 against 23.88 0-100 in Sudan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance score between Equatorial Guinea and Sudan?
- 2.77 0-100, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Sudan?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Sudan rank globally for voice and accountability - governance score?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 197th and Sudan ranks 200th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).