Cyprus vs Micronesia (country): Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100)

Cyprus
74.23 0-100
in 2025
Micronesia (country)
74.33 0-100
in 2025
Cyprus rank
47th
Micronesia (country) rank
46th

Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) over time

  • Cyprus
  • Micronesia (country)
020406080199620102025

How they compare

Micronesia (country) currently reports 74.33 0-100 against 74.23 0-100 in Cyprus, a difference of 0.1 0-100.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Micronesia (country) ahead.

Cyprus ranks 47th and Micronesia (country) ranks 46th of 208 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Cyprus averaged higher in 3 and Micronesia (country) in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cyprus Micronesia (country) Difference Ahead
1990s 73.7 0-100 76.53 0-100 2.83 0-100 Micronesia (country)
2000s 77.02 0-100 75.42 0-100 1.61 0-100 Cyprus
2010s 77.32 0-100 74.38 0-100 2.94 0-100 Cyprus
2020s 74.96 0-100 73.38 0-100 1.59 0-100 Cyprus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance score, Cyprus or Micronesia (country)?
Micronesia (country), at 74.33 0-100 against 74.23 0-100 in Cyprus as of 2025.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance score between Cyprus and Micronesia (country)?
0.1 0-100, with Micronesia (country) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Micronesia (country)?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Cyprus and Micronesia (country) rank globally for voice and accountability - governance score?
Cyprus ranks 47th and Micronesia (country) ranks 46th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cyprus vs Micronesia (country): Voice and Accountability - Governance score. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-score-0-100/cyprus/micronesia-fed-sts/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-score-0-100/cyprus/micronesia-fed-sts/">Cyprus vs Micronesia (country): Voice and Accountability - Governance score</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100)
Unit
0-100
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,514 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).