Côte d'Ivoire vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Voice and Accountability - Governance score

Côte d'Ivoire
46.06 0-100
in 2024
Tanzania, United Republic of
45.56 0-100
in 2024
Côte d'Ivoire rank
133rd
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
134th

Voice and Accountability - Governance score over time

  • Côte d'Ivoire
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
0204060199620102024

How they compare

Côte d'Ivoire currently reports 46.06 0-100 against 45.56 0-100 in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 0.5 0-100.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Côte d'Ivoire ahead.

Côte d'Ivoire ranks 133rd and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 134th of 206 countries.

Tanzania, United Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Côte d'Ivoire Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1990s 39.92 0-100 40.89 0-100 0.9689 0-100 Tanzania, United Republic of
2000s 34.66 0-100 50.78 0-100 16.12 0-100 Tanzania, United Republic of
2010s 44.33 0-100 52.72 0-100 8.39 0-100 Tanzania, United Republic of
2020s 45.31 0-100 45.42 0-100 0.1083 0-100 Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance score, Côte d'Ivoire or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Côte d'Ivoire, at 46.06 0-100 against 45.56 0-100 in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2024.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance score between Côte d'Ivoire and Tanzania, United Republic of?
0.5 0-100, with Côte d'Ivoire ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d'Ivoire and Tanzania, United Republic of?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Côte d'Ivoire and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for voice and accountability - governance score?
Côte d'Ivoire ranks 133rd and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 134th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Côte d'Ivoire vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Voice and Accountability - Governance score. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-score-0-100/cote-d-ivoire/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-score-0-100/cote-d-ivoire/tanzania/">Côte d'Ivoire vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Voice and Accountability - Governance score</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100)
Unit
0-100
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,259 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).