Colombia vs New Caledonia: Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100)
Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) over time
- Colombia
- New Caledonia
How they compare
New Caledonia currently reports 58.99 0-100 against 58.5 0-100 in Colombia, a difference of 0.49 0-100.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2018 it was New Caledonia ahead.
Colombia ranks 103rd and New Caledonia ranks 101st of 208 countries.
New Caledonia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | New Caledonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 59.95 0-100 | 75.94 0-100 | 15.99 0-100 | New Caledonia |
| 2020s | 59.37 0-100 | 69.5 0-100 | 10.13 0-100 | New Caledonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance score, Colombia or New Caledonia?
- New Caledonia, at 58.99 0-100 against 58.5 0-100 in Colombia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance score between Colombia and New Caledonia?
- 0.49 0-100, with New Caledonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and New Caledonia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2025.
- How do Colombia and New Caledonia rank globally for voice and accountability - governance score?
- Colombia ranks 103rd and New Caledonia ranks 101st of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).